Tue, 04/11/2008 - 6:49pm JESUS CHRIST is the only one

JESUS CHRIST is the only one who can interceed for us to the Father...Nobody else can.....only Christ is the mediator between God and man!..........."For there is one God, and one mediator also between God and men, the man Christ Jesus" 1 Timothy 2:5...
...........

nothing escapes the eye of God ..... He who cares for the sparrows cares much more for men who trust with all their hearts....... God has a purpose for everything.....

Tue, 02/12/2008 - 4:09pm CLARIFY ME

Can you clarify me is there is any difference in rich & poor in the eyes of GOD.

Thu, 29/01/2009 - 5:27pm HINDUISM TOLERANCE AND ITS LESSON FOR CHRISTIANTY

One of my friends questioned about our hinduism tolerance withn exact question u r majority yet u don,t have tolerance to forgive the minority people when they do wrong? i want to bring to his attention about hinduism tolerance and its secularism though this artcile.Also solution for your problem being regularly being attacked

Hinduism tolerance and secularism:
HINDUISM AND SIKHISM:
I want to bring to you attention the relationship we hindus have with Sikhs.

There was a practice in Punjab where Hindu families give their first born son to the Guru to be baptized as a Khalsa Sikh and join the Guru’s army of protectors. This practice started when Guru Gobind Singh in 1699 asked the Hindu families to give him their eldest sons to help raise the new Khalsa Army to protect Dharma and all against Mughal tyranny and forced conversions to Islam. As it is the Hindu religious duty of every Kshatriya including every Rajput to bear arms and protect society and the Dharma, local Punjabi Hindu Kshtriya families including Rajputs living in Punjab keenly supported the Guru and offered him their eldest sons all too willingly and the tradition continued hence many Punjabi Rajput families too have been giving their eldest sons to be enrolled in the Guru’s Army and baptized as Khalsa Sikhs. Thus there are many Hindu, Punjabi Hindu Rajput and Punjabi Hindu Mair Rajput families whose kin are followers of Sikhism today with their eldest sons as baptized Khalsa Sikhs. Thus there are many Sikhs who call themselves "Sikh Rajputs" today and still use Rajput family names.
I believe you don’t further proof about hindu-sikh relationship if want further iam obliged to furnish.
HINDUISM AND ISLAM:
There are numerous cases where hinduism and Islam shared brotherhood I will give you this most aspect of history when islam begins to take report.
One of the most important events in early Muslim history was the

battle of Karbala fought in 680 CE in which Imam Hussain, grandson of

the Prophet through his daughter Fatima and her husband Imam Ali, was

slaughtered along with a small band of disciples in a bloody battle

against Yazid, a tyrant who had usurped the Muslim caliphate. The

slaughter of Ali is one of the pivotal events that led to a divide

between the `mainstream' Sunni and Shi'a communities, with the latter

ascribing special importance to the family of Ali. This event occurred

in the Islamic month of Muharram, and it is for this reason that this

month is observed with great solemnity in many parts of the Muslim

world.
What is particularly striking about the observances of the month of

Muharram in India is the prominent participation of Hindus in the

rituals. This has been a feature of popular religion for centuries in

large parts of India, and continues even today, albeit on a smaller

scale. In towns and villages all over the country, Hindus join Muslims

in lamenting the death of Hussain, by sponsoring or taking part in

lamentation rituals and tazia processions. In Lucknow, seat of the

Shia Nawabs of Awadh, prominent Hindu noblemen like Raja Tikait Rai

and Raja Bilas Rai built Imambaras to house alams, standards

representing the Karbala event. The non-Muslim tribal Lambadi

community in Andhra Pradesh have their own genre of Muharram

lamentation songs in Telugu. Among certain Hindu castes in Rajasthan,

the Karbala battle is recounted by staging plays in which the death of

Imam Hussain is enacted, after which the women of the village come out

in a procession, crying and cursing Yazid for his cruelty. This custom

is known as pitna dalna. In large parts of north India, Hindus believe

that if barren women slip under an alam moving in a procession they

will be blessed with a child.

Perhaps the most intriguing case of Hindu veneration of Imam Hussain

is to be found among the small Hussaini Brahmin sect, located mostly

in Punjab, also known as Dutts or Mohiyals. Unlike other Brahmin

clans, the Hussaini Brahmins have had a long martial tradition, which

they trace back to the event of Karbala. They believe that an ancestor

named Rahab traveled all the way from Punjab to Arabia and there

developed close relations with Imam Hussain. In the battle of Karbala,

Rahab fought in the army of the Imam against Yazid. His sons, too,

joined him, and most of them were killed. The Imam, seeing Rahab's

love for him, bestowed upon him the title of Sultan or king, and told

him to go back to India. It is because of this close bond between

their ancestor Rahab and Imam Hussain that the Hussaini Brahmins got

their name.

HINDUISM AND JAINISM :
I never need to try to tell relationship between two as each of complemented each other throughout the history and both are dharmic based religion with different views.
I also want you offer some of the statistics about tolerence and secularism of Hindu and Indian people.
Zoroastrians (parsis) in india:
The condition of zoroastrians after mughal invasion in Iran:
Zoroastrians in Iran have had a long history, being the oldest religious community of that nation to survive to the present-day. Prior to the Muslim Arab invasion of Persia (Iran), Zoroastrianism had been the primary religion of the Persian people.
Since the fall of the Sassanid Zoroastrian empire by the Arab conquest of Persia, Zoroastrians in Iran have faced much religious discrimination including forced conversions, harassments, as well as being identified as najis and impure to Muslims, making them unfit to live alongside Muslims therefore forcing them to evacuate from cities and face major sanctions in all senses
The Iranian revolution of 1979 and the eventual establishment of the new theocratic Islamic Republic posed many initial setbacks for religious minorities. Today, the Zoroastrian community in Iran is estimated by some to number some 22,000 - half the size of that in existence before the 1979 Islamic revolution.[
Zoroastrians in INDIA:
Although the Parsis originally emigrated from Persia, most Indian Parsis have lost social or familial ties to Persians. Many do not share language or recent history with them. Over the centuries since the first Zoroastrians arrived in India, the Parsis have integrated themselves into Indian society while simultaneously maintaining their own distinct customs and traditions (and thus ethnic identity). This in turn has given the Parsi community a rather peculiar standing: they are Indians in terms of national affiliation, language and history, but not typically Indian (constituting only 0.006% of the total population) in terms of consanguinity or cultural, behavioural and religious practices.
Parsis have made considerable contributions to the history and development of India, all the more remarkable considering their small numbers. As the maxim "Parsi, thy name is charity" reveals, their greatest contribution, literally and figuratively, is their philanthropy (the term "Parsi" in Sanskrit means "one who gives alms"). Mahatma Gandhi would note in a much misquoted statement, "I am proud of my country, India, for having produced the splendid Zoroastrian stock, in numbers beneath contempt, but in charity and philanthropy perhaps unequalled and certainly unsurpassed.
Particularly notable Parsis in the fields of science and industry include physicist Homi J. Bhabha, and various members of the Tata, Godrej and Wadia industrial families. Particularly famous Parsi musicians include rock icon Freddie Mercury, composer Kaikhosru Shapurji Sorabji and conductor Zubin Mehta.
Indian census data (2001) records 69,601 Parsis in India, with a concentration in and around the city of Mumbai (previously known as Bombay).[1] There are approximately 5,000 Parsis elsewhere on the subcontinent, with an estimated 2500 Parsis in the city of Karachi and approximately 50 Parsi families in Sri Lanka. The number of Parsis worldwide is estimated to be fewer than 100,000 (Eliade, Couliano & Wiesner 1991, p. 254).
The parsis are the best example of hinduism’s secular and its dharma of accepting any outsider as long as he is beneficial to Indian society . You the torchbearers of christ can choose yourself in whatever category you wish(you can be boon or bane to the society).

HINDUISM AND BAHAI FAITH:
About 2.2 million people in India follow the Bahá'í Faith, thus forming the largest community of Bahá'ís in the world.
The faith originated in Iran in the mid-19th century. But almost half of its
5m followers today are in India. Anil Sarwal, head of India's Baha'i
movement, says its appeal to Indians derives from its emphasis on
universalism and on overcoming social differences, such as caste, which
deeply divides Indian society.
But do you know bahai followers were attacked in the place of faith’s origin?
Bahá'ís continue to be persecuted in Islamic countries, especially Iran, where over 200 believers were executed between 1978 and 1998.[58] The marginalization of the Iranian Bahá'ís by current governments is rooted in historical efforts by Shi`a clergy to persecute the religious minority.
Even though jains parsis and bahais are minority in negligble numbers do you why their places of worship is not being attacked? I will tell you answer for that.
Because they never do the aggressive baptizing to convert the people to other faith and they fundamentally accepted Indian secularism and given all things towards development of India still maintaining their individuality(religion language caste creed etc.). We hindus never urge christians that you mustn’t follow your customs and practices but don’t try to force it onto hindus. This aggressive practice will naturally result in backlash. Whoever intrested in other religions hinduism has openly allowed to convert to alternate faith but when it is being aggresively done in the religion then only it creates disorder and violence. For example is it possible in wold’s greatest democarcies U.S, U.K, FRANCE to go and preach my hinduism as aggressively being done in India(by christians)? Definitely not possible and never in the history hinduism belives in the conversion because of its belief that you need not be a hindu to follow hindu principles.

Thu, 29/01/2009 - 5:11pm Hinduism perspective on

SERBIAN GENOCIDE ON BOSNIAN MUSLIMS:
April 1992, the U.S. and European Community chose to recognize the independence of Bosnia, a mostly Muslim country where the Serb minority made up 32 percent of the population. Milosevic responded to Bosnia's declaration of independence by attacking Sarajevo, its capital city, best known for hosting the 1984 Winter Olympics. Sarajevo soon became known as the city where Serb snipers continually shot down helpless civilians in the streets, including eventually over 3,500 children.
Bosnian Muslims were hopelessly outgunned. As the Serbs gained ground, they began to systematically roundup local Muslims in scenes eerily similar to those that had occurred under the Nazis during World War II, including mass shootings, forced repopulation of entire towns, and confinement in make-shift concentration camps for men and boys. The Serbs also terrorized Muslim families into fleeing their villages by using rape as a weapon against women and girls.
The actions of the Serbs were labeled as 'ethnic cleansing,' a name which quickly took hold among the international media.
Despite media reports of the secret camps, the mass killings, as well as the destruction of Muslim mosques and historic architecture in Bosnia, the world community remained mostly indifferent. The U.N. responded by imposing economic sanctions on Serbia and also deployed its troops to protect the distribution of food and medicine to dispossessed Muslims. But the U.N. strictly prohibited its troops from interfering militarily against the Serbs. Thus they remained steadfastly neutral no matter how bad the situation became.
Throughout 1993, confident that the U.N., United States and the European Community would not take militarily action, Serbs in Bosnia freely committed genocide against Muslims. Bosnian Serbs operated under the local leadership of Radovan Karadzic, president of the illegitimate Bosnian Serb Republic. Karadzic had once told a group of journalists, "Serbs and Muslims are like cats and dogs. They cannot live together in peace. It is impossible."
When Karadzic was confronted by reporters about ongoing atrocities, he bluntly denied involvement of his soldiers or special police units.
On February 6, 1994, the world's attention turned completely to Bosnia as a marketplace in Sarajevo was struck by a Serb mortar shell killing 68 persons and wounding nearly 200. Sights and sounds of the bloody carnage were broadcast globally by the international news media and soon resulted in calls for military intervention against the Serbs.
The U.S. under its new President, Bill Clinton, who had promised during his election campaign in 1992 to stop the ethnic cleansing in Bosnia, now issued an ultimatum through the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) demanding that the Serbs withdraw their artillery from Sarajevo. The Serbs quickly complied and a NATO-imposed cease-fire in Sarajevo was declared.
The U.S. then launched diplomatic efforts aimed at unifying Bosnian Muslims and the Croats against the Serbs. However, this new Muslim-Croat alliance failed to stop the Serbs from attacking Muslim towns in Bosnia which had been declared Safe Havens by the U.N. A total of six Muslim towns had been established as Safe Havens in May 1993 under the supervision of U.N. peacekeepers.
Bosnian Serbs not only attacked the Safe Havens but also attacked the U.N. peacekeepers as well. NATO forces responded by launching limited air strikes against Serb ground positions. The Serbs retaliated by taking hundreds of U.N. peacekeepers as hostages and turning them into human shields, chained to military targets such as ammo supply dumps.
At this point, some of the worst genocidal activities of the four-year-old conflict occurred. In Srebrenica, a Safe Haven, U.N. peacekeepers stood by helplessly as the Serbs under the command of General Ratko Mladic systematically selected and then slaughtered nearly 8,000 men and boys between the ages of twelve and sixty - the worst mass murder in Europe since World War II. In addition, the Serbs continued to engage in mass rapes of Muslim females.
On August 30, 1995, effective military intervention finally began as the U.S. led a massive NATO bombing campaign in response to the killings at Srebrenica, targeting Serbian artillery positions throughout Bosnia. The bombardment continued into October. Serb forces also lost ground to Bosnian Muslims who had received arms shipments from the Islamic world. As a result, half of Bosnia was eventually retaken by Muslim-Croat tro
After three weeks of negotiations, a peace accord was declared. Terms of the agreement included partitioning Bosnia into two main portions known as the Bosnian Serb Republic and the Muslim-Croat Federation. The agreement also called for democratic elections and stipulated that war criminals would be handed over for prosecution. 60,000 NATO soldiers were deployed to preserve the cease-fire.
By now, over 200,000 Muslim civilians had been systematically murdered. More than 20,000 were missing and feared dead, while 2,000,000 had become refugees. It was, according to U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Richard Holbrooke, "the greatest failure of the West since the 1930s."

Does your bible teaches you to commit mass murder and rape in the name of regionalism and religion?Did your jesus ask the Slavic christians one of the best refined cultures to host this holocaust?If you are a true Christian answer this question.

Holocaust arranged by Portuguese on my HINDU GOA 500 years ago:
Please follow the following paragraphs closely:
• 1541: Francis Xavier landed in Goa - sent there by Ignatius Loyola of Jesuit order under the direction of the King João III of Portugal.
• 1545: Francis Xavier comes to the following conclusions that Hindus are an "unholy race" that they are "They are liars and cheats to the very backbone.". that"the Indians being black themselves, consider their own color the best" and also that
"they believe that their gods are black. On this account the great majority of their idols are as black as black can be, and moreover are generally so rubbed over with oil as to smell detestably, and seem to be as dirty as they are ugly and horrible to look at."
He writes to Rome to install inquisition in Goa immediately.
• 1560: Viceroy's building modified to become the palace of inquisition with 200 cells with residence of the first inquisitor, house of secret, house of doctrine, any number of cells, and other special ones: of secret, of penitence; of perpetual confinement; of the tortures etc. Inquisition installed with powers higher than those of viceroys.
• Apr-2 1560: Viceroy D Constantine de Braganca orders that all Brahmins should be thrown out of Goa and other areas under Portuguese control.
• Feb-7 1575: Governor Antonio Morez Barreto,issues orders that the propeties of those Hindus whose "presence was prejudicial to Christianity" would be confiscated.
• 1585 : The Third Concilio Provincial adopts a resolution asking the king of Portugal to banish from Goa 'the Brahmins, physicians and other infidels' who the Church finds as an obstacle to convert the 'the heathens' to the 'only true faith'.
• Jan-31, 1620: Portuguese government orders that "...no Hindu, of whatever nationality or status he may be, can or shall perform marriages in this city of Goa, nor in the islands or adjacent territories of His Majesty..."
• 1625: Governor Francisco Barreto, issues orders that 'bar Hindus from seeking employment' in the Portuguese held Indian territory and Portuguese officials were ordered not to 'use the services of any infidel in matters of his office anyway'
• Historian Alfredo DeMello describes the performers of Goan inquisition as
• "nefarious, fiendish, lustful, corrupt religious orders which pounced on Goa for the purpose of destroying paganism and introducing the true religion of Christ"
•
•
• The Goan inquisition is regarded by all contemporary portrayals as the most violent inquisition ever executed by the Portuguese Catholic Church. It lasted from 1560 to 1812 though in Europe it ended by 1774. (briefly restarted in 1778) Given below are some of the eye-witness accounts of this genocidal Holy office:
• Eye-witness accounts of Goan inquistion:
o "...The inquisition of Goa, distinguished itself on account of the greater rigors than those of the tribunals of the metropolis; thousands of victims died at the stake in flames.
-Joao Felix Pereira(19th century) in Historia de Portugal, 3rd edition, page 235
o "..The inquisition, this tribunal of fire, thrown on the surface of the globe for the scourge of humanity, this horrible institution, which will eternally cover with shame its authors, fixed its brutal domicile in the fertile plains of the Hindustan. On seeing the monster everyone fled and disappeared, Moguls, Arabs, Persians, Armenians, and Jews. The Indians even, more tolerant and pacific, were astounded to see the God of Christianism more cruel than that of Mohammed, deserted the territory of the Portuguese..."
-Memoirs of Judges Magalhães and Lousada: (Vol 2,Annaes Marítimos e Coloniais,page 59)
o "...The terrors inflicted on pregnant women made them abort....Neither the beauty or decorousness of the flower of youth, nor the old age, so worthy of compassion in a woman, exempted the weaker sex from the brutal ferocity of the supposed defenders of the religion..
..There were days when seven or eight were submitted to torture. These scenes were reserved for the inquisitors after dinner. It was a post-prandial entertainment. Many a time during those acts, the inquisitors compared notes in the appreciation of the beauty of the human form. While the unlucky damsel twisted in the intolerable pains of torture, or fainted in the intensity of the agony, one inquisitor applauded the angelic touches of her face, another the brightness of her eyes, another, the volluptuous contours of her breast, another the shape of her hands. In this conjuncture, men of blood transformed themselves into real artists !!
-Alexandre Herculano Famous writer of 19th century in his Fragment about the Inquisition
• Mechanism of Inquisition as recorded by Dellon a French Roman Catholic - 'a very mild account of inquisition':
o The cells:
a fetid cell, provided with a hole for relieving himself. But it overflowed, and there were faeces all over, an abominable smell, practically no light, save for slits on the wall, well above the reach of one’s hands.

o No honour even in death:
Those who died in the jail were buried inside the building, and as they were going to be judged, the bodies were exhumed, and the bones were kept to be burnt on the next auto da fé.

o Condemning the accused:
Seven witnesses were required to condemn a person. But the witnesses were never brought face to face with the hapless accused. The inquisition admitted the testimony of all kinds of people, even of those who were interested in the utter condemnation of the accused. Among the seven witnesses, was included the victim himself, who under torture had admitted the heresies that he had (not) committed.

o Tortures:
Three kinds of torture were practiced: 1) the rope or the pulley, 2) water and 3) fire. The torture by rope consisted of the arms being tied backwards and then raised by a pulley, leaving the victim hanging for some time, and then let the victim drop down to half a foot above the floor, then raised again. These continued up-and-down movement dislocated the joints and made the prisoner emit horrible cries of pain. This torture went on for an hour.
The torture by water was as follows: the victim was made to lie across an iron bar, and was forced to imbibe water without stopping. The iron bar broke the vertebrae and caused horrible pains, whereas the water treatment provoked vomits and asphyxia. Thetorture by fire was definitely the worst: the victim was hung above a fire, which warmed the soles of the feet, and the jailers rubbed bacon and other combustible materials on the feet. The feet were burned until the victim confessed. These last two tortures lasted for about an hour, and sometimes more.The house of torments was a subterranean grotto, so that other might not hear the cries of the wretched. Many a time, the victims died under torture; their bodies were interred within the compound, and the bones were exhumed for the auto da fe, and burnt in public.

o Showing them mercy by burning at stake:
By daylight, each convict was ordered to march alongside a godfather, one of the officials assigned to each victim. It was a great honor to be appointed godfather for these ceremonies. The procession was led through the long streets of the city,so that the multitudes could watch the ugly pageant. Finally, covered with shame and confusion, tired of the long march, the condemned reached the church of St. Francis, which was decked with great pomp and circumstance. The altar was covered with black cloth on which stood six silver candleholders. On both sides of the altar there were two kinds of thrones: the right side for the inquisitor and his councilors, and the left side for the viceroy and his court. The convicts and godfathers were seated on benches.
Next, four man-sized statues were brought, accompanied by four men who carried boxes full of bones of the victims who had died by tortures: these statues, wearing the Samarra and representing the dead victims would be tried too. Once the sermon was concluded, two officials went up to the pulpit to read publicly the proceedings of all the guilty, and to declare the sentences upon them.
The condemned to be burnt at the stake were delivered to the secular arm, to which the Inquisition begged to use clemency and mercy with these wretched, and to impose the death penalty without effusion of blood - by burning them at stake!
• Remarks of a historian:
• The words Auto da fé reverberated throughout Goa, reminiscent of the furies of Hell, which concept, incidentally does not exist in the Hindu pantheon. On April 1st 1650 for instance, four people were burnt to death, the next auto da fé was on December 14, 1653, when 18 were put to the flames, accused of the crime of heresy. And from the 8th April 1666 until the end of 1679 - during which period Dellon was tried - there were eight autos da fé, in which 1208 victims were sentenced. In November 22, 1711 another auto da fé took place involving 41 persons. Another milestone was on December 20, 1736, when the Inquisition burnt an entire family of Raaim, Salcete, destroying their house, putting salt on their land, and placing a stone padrao, which still existed in the place (at least in 1866)
• -Alfredo De Mello ('Memoirs of Goa' Chapter 21)

Do you want any further proof of atrocities commited by chritistians and its missionaries in the name of religion.? I will attach you this long list of crimes commited throughout the century worldwide and its contribution of erasing of so many precious cultures just go through this CONLUDE HOW TOLERANT YOUR CHRISTIANS TOWRDS LOCAL CULTURE?
Don’t question the authenticity of Hinduism level of tolerance . It is far more superior than tolerance exibhited by christianty throughout the century. Analyze the rootcause of your problem(why worship places are being attacked) and come to a correct viewpoint and then try to find out the solutions

Thu, 29/01/2009 - 10:49pm hindu tolerance??

every time you bring about the subject of 'hindu' tolerance its always something that happened 100s of years ago..
how about now???

lemme list it out

babri masjid
post babri masjid riots
graham staines & sons
post godhra riots
orissa riots
mangalore church attacks
mangalore pub attack
the material available on the blog about the atrocities committed....

why dont you look now... instead of what indian 'culture'(a very volatile word given todays scenario)
was centuries ago....

basically the crux of the matter is this

the insecure hindu youth (only a few) wants revenge for...

mughal invasion
british invasion
portugese invasion

GET A LIFE AND MOVE AHEAD.....

Fri, 30/01/2009 - 3:25pm chrsitian tolerence?

ANSWER THIS QUESTION

YOU ARE SAYING THAT YOUR FOREFATHERS HUNDREDS OF YEARS AGO

ACCEPTED THE GANG RAPE, MASS MURDER, RAPING OTHERS WIFE AS

LEGITIMATE WAY OF LIFE AND THEY WOULD ALSO ORDER THEIR SIBBLING TO

FORGET IF IT HAPPENS TO THEIR FAMILY.AFTER HUNDRED YEARS YOU WILL

FORGET ABOUT RAPES MURDERS AND EVERY ATROCITIES COMMITED IN THE NAME

OF RELIGION TO YOUR FAMILY . COULD YOU OR YOU FELLOW CHRISTIAN

BROTHERS FORGET IF IT HAPPENS TO YOUR OR YOUR FELLOW FAMILY

IMMEDIATELY? IF YOU SAY YOU WILL FORGET I SERIOUISLY DOUBT YOUR FAMILY

RELIGOUS OR CULTURAL BELIEFS. IF IT HAPPENS FOR HINDUISM IT MUST BE

FORGOT BY HINDUS IMMEDIATELY OTHERWISE IF IT IS COMMITED AGAINST

CHRISTIANS IT CAN SPOKEN BE FOR ANY NUMBER OF CENTURIES.THAT IS THE

LOGIC YOU ARE CONCLUDING HERE.

DON,T SEE THE LIST PARTIALLY WITH YOUR CHRISTIAN LENS.SEE JUST HOW

SERBIAN-GENOCIDE COMMITED AGAINST BOSNIAN MUSLIMS SOME 10 YEARS

BACK.Slobodan Milošević WAS CONVICTED FOR WARCRIME AND ETHNIC

CLEANSING OF BOSNIAN MUSLIMS.THIS WAS JUST 10 YEARS BACK BUDDY.WAS

MILOSEVIC THE SLAV CHRISTAIN GUIDED BY JESUS TO MASS MURDER AND GANG

RAPE THE INNOCENT MINORITY BOSNIAN MUSLIMS? THE OFFICIAL DEATH COUNT

OF BOSNIAN MUSLIMS 2,00,000. ACCORDING TO YOUR CONCEPT BOSNIAN

MUSLIM MUST FORGET ATTROCITIES COMMITED TO THEM AND FOLLOW

CHRISTIANITY.

ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF CHRISTIAN TOLERANCE:

CHRISTIAN TERRORISM IN NAGALAND TRIPURA
The National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT) is a rebel group operating in Tripura, North-East India. The NLFT were declared a terrorist organization under the Indian Prevention of Terrorism Act in 2002. The NLFT manifesto says that they want to expand what they describe as the kingdom of God and Christ in Tripura.[34] They are accused of forcing indigenous tribes to give up Hinduism and become Christian in areas under their control.[34] In 2000 the Indian government of Tripura announced that it had hard evidence that the Baptist Church of Tripura was backing the NLFT.

The National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT) is a rebel group operating in Tripura, North-East India. The NLFT were declared a terrorist organization under the Indian Prevention of Terrorism Act in 2002. The NLFT manifesto says that they want to expand what they describe as the kingdom of God and Christ in Tripura.[34] They are accused of forcing indigenous tribes to give up Hinduism and become Christian in areas under their control.[34] In 2000 the Indian government of Tripura announced that it had hard evidence that the Baptist Church of Tripura was backing the NLFT.

The Nagaland Rebels is a coalition of rebel groups operating in Nagaland, North-East India. The largest of these is the National Socialist Council of Nagaland-Isak-Muivah (NSCN-IM), which is fighting for the establishment of a "Nagaland for Christ".[38][39] The NSCN-IM have carried out numerous acts of terrorism against the Indian Army, other ethnic groups, and opponents within their own ethnic group.[38] The insurgency has been waged since the 1947 Indian declaration of independence, and has resulted in tens of thousands of deaths.[38]

The BBC reported on October 2 that a group of Christian terrorists, the National Liberation Front of Tripura, has 'banned' the Hindu festival Durga Puja in Tripura. They have warned any tribals that those celebrating this festival will be shot. They declare that they want all of Tripura to be Christian.

It is the same terrorists who shot and killed a Hindu priest a few weeks ago, in his own temple. Similarly, Bineshwar Brahma, a Hindu Bodo activist and litterateur, was shot dead by Christian militants in Guwahati in August, explicitly based on his religion. None of these incidents has been reported widely, or at all, in the Indian print media. I read about them at the BBC's online site.

Christians are on a rampage in the Northeast, indulging in ethnic cleansing and religious violence, killing Hindus, supported by white fundamentalist churches, especially American ones. The human rights of Hindus are being violated: for instance, there are the Reangs who have been ethnically cleansed from their homes. But this is not news for the 'secular' 'progressives'.

There seems to be a conspiracy of silence in the Indian print media about the activities of the Christian Taliban of the Northeast. I wonder, is this silence being bought with cold cash? Or is it purely ideological? Why isn't anyone demanding the kind of action that was taken when that Australian Christian missionary was murdered? Am I wrong in concluding that the life of a white Christian is worth far more than the lives of religious Hindus?

The assault on Hinduism continues elsewhere, too. Here is an e-mail that reader Sridhar forwarded me. I have not verified these facts about the books mentioned, I am merely forwarding the message.

IF YOU MORE EVIDENCE YOU CAN CHECK ANY BLOGS AS YOU

LIST OF ACHIEVEMENTS DONE BY CHRISTANS TERRORISTS AGAINST MINORITY

HINDUS AND TRIBES:

BANNING OF DURGA POOJA OFFENDERS WILL BE SHOT(I BELIEVE CHRIST'S SONS DON'T HAVE TOLERANCE IN THE DIPLOMACY THAT'S WHY NAGA CHRISTIANS
ALWAYS RESORT TO JAMESBOND STUFF)

OPEN FUNDINNG OF TERRORISM BY BPATIST CHURCHES AND EVEN GOVERMENT OF INDIA(PRO CHRISTIAN AGENCY) HAVE PROOF FOR THIS FUNDING.

KILLING HINDU PRIEST Bineshwar Brahma FOR HIS ACTIVITIES.

THE ABOVE INCIDENTS HAPPENED WITHIN TIMEFRAME OF 10 YEARS AND STILL ETHNIC CLEANSING HAPPENS IN NORTH EAST.

HENCE CHRISTIAN YOUTHS ARE SO INSECURE THEY WANT TO ERASE THE

HINDUISM FROM NORTHEAST (BUT I DON'T KNOW FOR WHAT REVENGE).

CONCLUSION: WHENEVER YOU CHRISTIANS ARE MAJORITY YOU WILL ENFORCE

YOUR OWN RULE(POLITELY OR AT THE GUNPOINT). WHEN YOU ARE MINORITY

OTHERS MUST BE SECULAR AND FOLLOW WAHTEVER THE JESUS(THE ONLY GOD)

TOLD IN THE BIBLE . ANALYSE THE ABOVE TOPICS AND IF YOU ARE STILL

WILLING TO FIGHT ME REPLY.

SO INSTEAD OF GIVING LIFE TO OTHERS RESPECT OTHER PEOPLE(THEIR

CULTURE)AND LIVE THE LIFE(CREATED BY GOD)

Fri, 30/01/2009 - 6:54am You just listed few

You just listed few incidents not the historical continus periods. Hindus were supressed hunderes of years, not few days.
You cannot compare Mangalore attack to Portugese inquisit.

Also, all of the above incedents from hindus are reactionary not aggression. We have fed up with people like (neo-converts). you are more dangerous than 'old' christains.

Go to study, before giving stupid comments